Marc Wilson: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:42:49PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > > Yes, i386. aptitude here doesn't think so. I'm trying to work around it. > > Yes, but we all know aptitude is crap, with ideas about dependency > resolution different from the known universe, so if you're going to use it, > don't mix it with any other package management.
Of course it's best to always use aptitude if one is going to use it at
all, but I cannot think of situations where it might be dangerous to use
plain dpkg/apt.
> It *will* break your box.
Care to elaborate on that?
J.
--
If I could travel through time I would go back to yesterday and
apologise.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
