On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:09:07AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: > Quoting Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [snip] > > An MX is only needed if some other system is going to be handling the > > mail bound for that one. > > > > You can get away with this most of the time. However, the RFCs do > require that you have an MX record and some mail servers are setup to > not accept mail from servers/domains that do not have MX records as a > anti-spam measure. If you are using dyndns.org, you can set a MX > record.
Uh, I just finished reading rfc 2821 for a project and I can't agree with your reading at all. I refer you to section 5 (page 60). Could you explain why you feel the RFC says you MUST have an MX record? -- Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] There's a positive side to non-technical people -- they actually tend to have some grasp of how human psyche works. -- Josip Rodin (on d-devel) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
