On Wednesday 19 June 2002 21:32, martin f krafft wrote: > it might be a problem. the 2.4 kernel has the most embarassing > virtual memory management i've seen. quite possible it's the cause. > 2.2 still had fair (not good) virtual memory management.
I hope you aren't talking about that pre-2.4.10 "let's kill init if we're short on memory" VM? -- Embedded Linux -- True multitasking! TWO TOASTS AT THE SAME TIME! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
