On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 21:04, Chris Kenrick wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 06:04:26PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 05:58:36PM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote: [snip] > This is true. Consensus on this thread so far seems to suggest that the > external USR modems are of good quality. Unfortunately, these are not > quite so common as other brands here in .au, and the ones I've seen are > hellishly expensive and/or come with unneeded features such as a built > in digital answering machine. There is however a Mitsubishi external > that's advertised as supporting Linux, anyone tried it? (The other > brands advertised commonly are D-Link,Swann,Netcomm and the like)
I'd be gabberflaster if any external modem does _not_ support Linux... So, when in doubt, go external. Even cheap external modems would cause problems to both Linux & Windows equally. -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81 | | | | "Object-oriented programming is an exceptionally bad idea | | which could only have originated in California." | | --Edsger Dijkstra | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
