Hi Karsten, Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2002 08:17 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
> > [...] > > but I'm wondering if it breaks the page layout. > > Define "breaking page layout". According the meaning of css-capabilities I define it as arranging page-elements pixel-by-pixel. > My experience is that websites > render consistently and readably. Do you mean: In the manner of 'I can literally read the phrases'? > If they're predicated on text > sizing to specific dimensions, they're broken by design already. Page-design not usually breaks readable text, but maybe too often. > I've only seen one site that fails to render readably. For the > most part, standardizing results is far preferable to seeing the > crud webmonkeys are churning out these days. css comming up to be a standard. I agree that there is really cruel design out there on the net: Unuseful and overwhelming with it's flicking and flashing effects. > Let's repeat together: "HTML is not a presentation language. > Flash is crap to five nines." Crap to 'five nines' relative to what? No, I don't agree referring to flash, the design made by some flashdesigners is not always that bad. And last but not least: Images and sounds got the power to communicate things too. HTML is not a presentationlanguage, but css is. But you're right: people have forgotten the meaning of HTML these days. They often don't think on it in a communicative manner. And I think they're paying for it these days. Fortunateley there is a bugfix for mozilla out now. Web designers are not limited by such a bug. But they are nevertheless responsible to fit to a culture of communication, considerate to the netcitizens. > Peace. regards gerhard ps: sorry about my poor english -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
