On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:41:33PM +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote: > On Friday 07 June 2002 22:39, John Hasler wrote: > > It is impossible to comment intelligently on your suggestion without > > knowing approximately how much longer it will be until the > > infrastructure situation is resolved. > > OK, just to play the idiot here: > IMHO it wasn't the best thing to freeze woody before those problems were > resolved in the first place. As I see it, those problems were known > some time before the freeze happened, probably in hope that the > problems would be resolved soon. So I'd definitely be pro?-unfreeze to > stop the apparent hiatus the whole Debian project is on.
The freeze for the last release was a whole lot longer than this one looks likely to be. Any hiatus felt by individual developers is entirely up to them; unstable no longer affects testing, so they're quite free to develop there, and in fact are probably more likely to do so if testing is kept frozen and safe. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
