On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 07:41:17PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > The argument, or at least the one I made, was not about certain arches > having priority over others. My point was that since i386 is the most > common arch in use, the i386 packages are the most heavily tested and > are therefore ready for release before other arches.
But this really isn't what's holding things up. Anyway, there seems to be movement: see -devel-announce. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
