> On Thursday 06 June 2002 17:11, Charles Lewis wrote: > > Does anyone know what the real status of KDE3 in sid is? I've been > > told that we were waiting on gcc 3.1, but that's been in sid for a > > while. I've also been told that we are waiting on xfree86 4.2 (which > > apparently is waiting on woody, which is waiting on security updates, > > etc). > > Hmmm... dependency hell. First of all, I don't see how this is off topic since it is dealing with a critical package in a debian distribution. Secondly, if it is "dependency hell" as you say, why are there working unofficial debs out there? chas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Oleg
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Brian Nelson
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? David Z Maze
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Jeronimo Pellegrini
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Brian Nelson
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Tom Cook
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Brian Nelson
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Jeronimo Pellegrini
- KDE3 in sid? Charles Lewis
- Re: KDE3 in sid? (OT) Nicos Gollan
- Re: KDE3 in sid? (not OT) Charles Lewis
- Re: KDE3 in sid? (not OT) Mark Roach
- Re: KDE3 in sid? (not OT) Charles Lewis
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Carl Fink
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Colin Watson
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Alan Shutko
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Anthony Campbell
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Carl Fink
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Noah Meyerhans
- RE: Debian: abandon ship? Brooks R. Robinson
- Re: Debian: abandon ship? Noah Meyerhans