On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 12:32:02AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Wed, May 22, 2002, Petro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > So it has been brought up before, over 2 years ago, and it's still
> > wrong?
>
> The point was that the answer to your question ("Is this the first...")
> is readily available from the usual place. Your assignment is to read
> the earlier posts and either:
>
> - Formulate a previously unaddressed reason root should have a
> statically linked shell, rather than pollute the list with largely
> irrelevent dialog.
>
> - Understand why the current alternative(s) are sufficient.
>
> - Summarize findings to list and quietly exit the topic.
- If you find something that should be done, file a bug report or talk
to a more appropriate mailing list.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
