On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:50:08AM -0700, Alexander Konovalenko wrote: > --- Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 03:07:34AM -0700, Alexander Konovalenko > > wrote: > > > I would like to install a more-or-less production quality > > > version of LVM with woody on i386. > > I was thinking in the same line :) > > > Sistina.com says that the latest stable release of LVM is > > > 1.0.4, while both 1.1-rc2 and LVM2 are beta versions. > > So you are looking at lvm10 > > > > > Was version 1.0.4 packaged for Debian by the lvm maintainer? > > > (Robert (rvdm), are you that maintainer?) > > > > Look at changelog.debian in /usr/share/doc/lvm10. It was tracking > > 1.0.1 up to 1.0.1release-1 then startied to track 1.1. Latest entry > > say: > > > > lvm10 (1.1rc1-2) unstable; urgency=high > > > > * Fixed lvmsadc lock bug (Closes: #139169) > > * Fixed lvm name check bug (Closes: #140957) > > * lvm is been working fine with debian kernels a while now (Closes: > > #122753) > > > > -- Robert van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 29 Apr 2002 > > 12:14:20 +0200 > > > > Considering woody is freeze mode after around May1, this is very new. > > > > As usual, he is not blindly following upstream but keep applying > > local patch. It is second build (1.1rc1-2) With last statement it > > sounds good to me. > > So, if I understand you correctly, your message is that 1.1rc1-2 > is stable enough.
I do not for sure but that is my reading of package builder's thoughts. > After reading the changlelog (I should've done > that before) and looking at the list of bugs I tend to agree with > you. There are some bugs that need to be fixed but no one is > fatal nor breaks essential behavior of LVM. Let's see how it will > work in reality. If you know exactly, file a bu report to BTS. Maintainer may send update to unstable then you may be able to get it :) ... -- ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++ Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA See "User's Guide": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/ See "Debian reference": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ "Debian reference" Project at: http://qref.sf.net I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
