On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 04:54:03PM -0500, Grant Edwards wrote: > > it is trying to decide if it should use pcmcia_cs or the 2.4.x pcmcia kernel > > code. (PC for pcmcia_cs, KD for kernel) > > Yes. I know. > > The question I really asked were: > > 1) Why not used modprobe in the pcmcia_cs case? > > 2) Why ignore the options from /etc/default/pcmcia in the > kernel case? > > And another one I should have asked was: > > 3) Why does the Debian kernel build procedure put modules in > _both_ places, fooling the script anyway? > > I've gotten my system to work by deleting > /lib/modules/<version>/pcmcia and adding the options to the > modprobe command in the KD case. > > But, shouldn't the Debian pcmcia script and a kernel built with > the Debian kernel-build process work together?
BTW, the main reason I'm using the kernel modules is that they are more up to date (e.g. orinoco_cs 0.09b in the kernel vs. 0.08 in pcmcia_cs). -- Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
