me& wrote:
> if one would need to install a production server would he choose Potato or
> Woody? I have nothing against installing Potato but what bothers me is
> ipchains and the relative old kernel. Do I need to be worried about future
> packages, who can be interesting, who will not being able to run on the old
> kernel?
Speaking for myself: I believe that Woody is already frozen enough.
I have just decided to start for migrating production servers to woody.
But if you really want to play save, perhaps it is better to stay
on "potato".
PS: - woody will come with kernel 2.2
- why not install kernel 2.4.X on potato?
regards,
--
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim -- vLSM.org -- http://rms46.vLSM.org --
-- 152.118? 167.205? Ha! ---------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
