On 0, Niall Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bah... I get dozy if I get up too early :-) > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 07:48:42PM +0100, Niall Brady wrote: > > > > The problem is (and I'm not too hot on apt, so forgive me if I'm > > wrong :-) that by default you can do 'apt upgrade' (or whatever the > > s/can/can\'t/ > > > incantation is if it exists) to update a package and all it's > > dependencies at the moment, safely. > > zap safely :-) Can't be done at all...
If there is a new version available in the sources defined in
/etc/apt/sources.list then why don't you think that 'apt-get install
x' will upgrade package x and all its dependencies? I regularly
upgrade packages like this, even mixing some sid stuff with a woddy
box. What is the problem?
Tom
--
Tom Cook
Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide
"That you're not paranoid does not mean they're not out to get you."
- Robert Waldner
Get my GPG public key:
https://pinky.its.adelaide.edu.au/~tkcook/tom.cook-at-adelaide.edu.au
pgpjrpoJswgn8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
