On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 00:35, ben wrote: > On Wednesday 10 April 2002 11:54 pm, Simon Hepburn wrote: > > ben wrote: > > > thanks for the input. so, on attachments, none? some? > > > > If I'm helping people out with, say X problems for example, I'd far prefer > > to see their config and log files as attachments rather than pasted, simply > > beccause of the sheer length of them. Also a lot of files, for example > > fstab, are just plain awkward to read when pasted and wrapped. And what > > about gpg ? Attachments are pretty useful things on the whole, even if some > > of them might contain things none of us are interested in . > > 1. no spam > > 2. text-only (no html, ms-tnef, etc.) > > 3. wrap text > > since i've not been done wrong by any attachment i've ever received, and no > real objection to them exists as yet, what other conditions need apply? while > the three above seem trivial, the purpose of this is to generate an advisory > notice for new subscribers. what else shoud be on that list? >
4. Spell check. -- first impressions are bunk (unknown) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]