On Wednesday 10 April 2002 10:45 pm, Gary Turner wrote: [snip] > >> > >> Mailing lists should be treated like usenet, only better ;-) > > > >thanks for the input. so, on attachments, none? some? > > > > I have no problem with attachments. In many cases, where a file is > long, attachments are preferred. I often have neither the > qualifications nor interest needed to enjoy wading through pages of this > script or that configuration. I do often benefit from the commentary > and queries though. If I do want to see it, opening is trivial. > > Think of it as an if(), inline a small instruction, put a big one out of > the way.
1. no spam 2. text-only (no html, ms-tnef, etc.) 3. wrap text 4. attachments ? how about a stipulation that attachments also be plain text only? does that negatively encroach on pgp signatures in any way? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
