On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:26:43PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote: > > Uh, what? bash is a bourne shell (and then some). ash is probably a > > more "pure" bourne shell; it's not clear to me whether it strives more > > for bourne or POSIX compliance. Who told you debian didn't have a > > bourne shell? I'd request that they reach between their legs, grasp > > their neck firmly and pull hard ... they just _might_ pull their head > > out of their ass. > Oracle support says it must be the bourne shell, not the bourne again > shell. > Most likely an excuse to put the pressure on somebody else, but that's > what their tech said.
So install ash as /bin/sh, and see what they have to say. -- Nathan Norman - Micromuse Ltd. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gil-galad was an Elven-king. | The Fellowship Of him the harpers sadly sing: | of the last whose realm was fair and free | the Ring between the Mountains and the Sea. | J.R.R. Tolkien
pgpCiv4MGLTyp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
