John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Isn't this exactly the obligation you impose when you allow that invariant > sections from the GFDL are DFSG-free? The classic invariant section is > literally RMS's soapbox in the EMACS documentation...
Yes, it is just such an obligation. But apparently you didn't bother to pay close enough attention to what I said on debian-legal. I shouldn't be feeding the troll anyhow.
