On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:54:49AM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 04:41:15PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:45:41PM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 12:51:17PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: > > > > http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/apt-proxy/unstable > > > > > I would like to try it, but I (well, my nameserver) can't seem to > > > resolve apt-proxy.sourceforge.net at the moment. > > > > It's just part of sourceforge. Can you see the apt-proxy project on > > sourceforge? If you can, follow the link to the homepage from there. > > Yes, I saw the project page, followed the homepage link, and my browser > couldn't find it. DNS lookup didn't work either. I'll check it again now > ... yes, it's working again. Oh well ... > > > > > > Is it too big to post here? > > > > Well, no, not the script itself so I'll attach it. I was hoping I might > > trick you into installing the newer version so I had another tester :-)) > > Hm, now that I can actually get to that homepage, I may even consider > it. Ah, I see it's aptable. Great. You have another tester.
To get back to the original topic of this thread: Well, I'm testing it now, and I did some stupid things with my apt-move cache, but it seems the apt-proxy-import script wouldn't work anyway, since apt-move seems to strip off the _i386 part of the filenames. -- Note that I use Debian version 3.0 Linux mus 2.4.17mvz2 #1 Wed Feb 27 17:41:43 CET 2002 i686 unknown Matijs
