begin Alan James quotation: > Bob Thibodeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I thought I'd try Sylpheed after seing mention of it on this > > list, but never felt like configuring another client. Now that > > I've read it doesn't play nice with mutt, I'll just remove it. > > I've got it working reasonable nicely with mutt/procmail. The only > issue is that slypheed uses its own mechanism for marking mail as read > rather than a sequences file. This means that when I use mutt, I see > the mail thats new since the last time i ran mutt, and Sylpheed shows > whats new since I last ran sylpheed. > > This is only a very minor annoyance though, and I think I'll stick > with this configuration for a while.
I found it a major annoyance, but maybe I just receive a lot more mail than you do. To me, also, there was the basic question, why do I need two different mail clients? Aside from the lack of point-and-click to select messages, mutt has a pretty decent UI, and it's customizable enough that I was able to work around the things that annoyed me the most about it. So now I just use mutt. > Of course migrating to Sylpheed means converting your mailboxes into > MH format, and modifying your procmail scripts to use rcvstore. Procmail understands MH format, so why do you need rcvstore? Craig
pgpWXyL1UOjOh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
