>>"Blars" == Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 Blars> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 >> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:52:03AM -0500, stan wrote:
 >>> Anyone know if SpamBouncer www.spambouncer.org is being mainatined?
 >> dunno

        It is, intermittently. I use it

 Blars> Me neither.  Since what it does is bombard the victim the
 Blars> spammer forged in the headers, hopfully it's dead and won't be
 Blars> revived.  If you want to bounce spam, do it in the SMTP
 Blars> session you're receiving the message in.

        It does not do so unless you configure it to. I don't send
 bounces, either to harass the victims or to confirm my email address.

 >>> If not, any sugestions as to an alternate?
 >> http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim_spamassassin.html

 Blars> Does something totally different, and could be useful.  The
 Blars> default rule scoring seems pretty far off to me though.

        I use both in sequence, along with mailagent, and I rarely see spam.

        manoj
-- 
 Even if a fool lived with a wise man all his life, he would still not
 recognise the truth, like a wooden spoon cannot recognise the flavour
 of the soup. 64
Manoj Srivastava   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply via email to