On 29 Jan 2002 11:03:07 -0800 Dave Carrigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walter Tautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] > > > Just curious to hear other people's opinions on this matter, i.e. > > don't use devfs. It seems to me the debian kernel should have > > CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=n. > > Some people want devfs. Devfs can't be created as a module. Hence, the > logical choice is to build the kernel with devfs support. Nothing's > forcing you to use devfs, even if your kernel has devfs support, and the > overhead is not very much. But, let's say I just want to play with devfs, could I still go back to my old disk-based setup? Could I still boot my old devfsd-disabled kernel after using a devfsd-enabled kernel? -- Humanity's future is in the stars: support a manned mission to Mars! http://www.thinkmars.net/petition/addpetition.html
