On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:06:06PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Of course apt (which is nothing without the excellent work the package > maintainers put in). I like the philosophical stance of Debian > GNU/Linux being a big proponent of the GPL. I don't think KDE would > even have changed their licence had it not been for Debian. My 2c :)
Huh? KDE has *always* been GPL. Not only that, but Debian doesn't favor the GPL over other free software licenses by any means. Read the DFSG sometime. All licences which meet those criteria are equal in the eyes of Debian. Sure, that includes the GPL, but it also includes many other licenses: Xfree86, Apache, BSD, Artistic, etc etc. Sorry if I'm being overly pedantic. noah -- _______________________________________________________ | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html
pgp2RBTAxm5v9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
