On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, martin f krafft wrote:
> not quite that harsh. the SAIR test is still a fair test (i should be a
> poet), but its emphasis is more on the test itself rather than on the
> {knowledge,experience} base it's supposed to certify. does that make sense?
Yeah.
> and hey, i warn you: this is all my humble opinion, and i *am* LPI
> affiliated. (but since LPI is non-profit, i am not interested in selling
> this to you. i've made up my mind about LPI and SAIR, and that hasn't
> changed since i did so. if i wouldn't believe LPI was better, i'd be
> SAIR affiliated.)
Good point.
> > Ouch. Would be nice if RPM didn't suck harder than CAB...
>
> not entirely true, RPM is very capable. in fact, there's little it can't
> do compared to DEB. the packaging system itself isn't the only thing
> that makes it good. DEB would suck without the FHS. but please, this has
> been discussed to the point of death.
Very true. Red Hat could definately use some package name
standardisation which it very badly lacks.
--
Baloo
