On Thursday 17 January 2002 04:05 am, Erik Steffl wrote: > martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2306 +0100]: > > > if you have more then one temporarily mounted filesystem, where do > > > you mount it? It does not make sense to have a mount point for one > > > filesystem but not for few of them. > > > > as others have said and suggested, i also rarely use /mnt. if i need a > > mount point, i'll quickly create one on the fly. i believe there are > > the question was _WHERE_ (with implied: so that it doesn't break FHS). > [we are not talking about mount for one user, (s)he can do it somewhere > under ~, we are talking about system wide mounts (for everybody)] > > erik
this is getting really fucking boring. the fhs, just like the government, should restrict its intrusion into my life to the point of the most minimal, not maximal, necessity. let the fhs set up a criteria based on what is only absolutely necessary for general compliance with the way the world works, and then back the fuck off. i'm really tired of this pseudo-fascist idea that everything has to look the same way. whether i use /mnt/floppy, mount on the fly, or never mount another goddamn floppy in my life has only to do with the functionality of the system for which i am responsible. this nitpicking bullshit is absolutely pathetic.
