What's the deal? Every email I get has the same header and
subjust line which doesn't match with the actual messages.
I usually just browse the subjects to see if there is
anything I'm interested in.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ATTACHMENT part 1 message/rfc822
>
> debian-user-digest Digest
> Volume 102 : Issue 99
>
> Today's Topics:
> Re: graphical lilo [ "Sridhar M.A."
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> gpm 1.19.6-8 seems broken... hold on [ thedoctor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: problems copying audio cd w/ cdr [ Thomas Kral
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Gnome Error Message [ "Eileen Orbell"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: gpm 1.19.6-8 seems broken... hol [ Colin Watson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: (OT-ish:) procmail eating messag [ martin f krafft
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> how to report bugs (was: Re: Locale [ martin f krafft
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: Fetchmail Problems with Retrievi [ Mark Wagnon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: (OT-ish:) procmail eating messag [ martin f krafft
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: Fetchmail Problems with Retrievi [ Mark Wagnon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: X Configuration in Woody [ Mark Wagnon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: user logger! [ martin f krafft
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: Debian Vs RedHat [ martin f krafft
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: Gnome Error Message [ Tobias Wolter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: gpm 1.19.6-8 seems broken... hol [ Brian Nelson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: gpm 1.19.6-8 seems broken... hol [ thedoctor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> exim + fetchmail configuration quest [
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael A. Mill ]
> Strange problem with modem when comp [ "Terence
> Sheridan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: Strange problem with modem when [
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allan M. Wi ]
> lpr: unable to create temporary file [ Aidan OReilly
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: X Configuration in Woody [ Dimitri Maziuk
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: (OT) A strange situation ... Cou [ Dimitri Maziuk
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: X Configuration in Woody [ Mark Wagnon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: RFC: Beginner's vim tutorial [ Romain Lerallut
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: RFC: Beginner's vim tutorial [ dman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> gtk theming documentation? [ Timo --Blazko--
> Boewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> Re: exim + fetchmail configuration q [ dman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: list all packages that are insta [ csj
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: RFC: Beginner's vim tutorial [ Romain Lerallut
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Re: Play VCD on computer [ Mark Ferlatte
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
>
> ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:13:13 +0100
> From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Subject: Debian, FHS & /floppy
>
> Dear FHS people,
>
> i am writing to you, spawned by a thread we are having on
> the debian-user
> mailing list[1]. it's basically addressing the lack of
> inclusion of mount
> points like /floppy and /cdrom in the FHS. even though
> the FHS prohibits
> placing *anything* (directories actually) into / which
> isn't explicitly
> allowed, it also dictates that /mnt is to be used as a
> temporary mount
> point. RedHat and other distributions mount floppy and
> cdrom in and
> /mnt/{floppy,cdrom} and we feel that that's even more
> wrong (section
> 3.11)
>
> if you agree with us that /floppy and /cdrom are good
> mount points, then
> would you consider amending the 2.3 version of the FHS to
> include this?
> and if you disagree, would you engage in a proper
> discussion with us?
>
> this is being CCd to the debian-user list, so if you
> reply, please
> include the list in your reply (no need to CC me
> explicitly).
>
> [1] sorry, the thread hasn't made it into the archives
> yet. i'll let you
> know when it gets there...
>
> --
> martin; (greetings from the heart of the
> sun.)
> \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:";
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> void write_thesis(char *subject, char *title} {
> // do something
> }
>
> ATTACHMENT part 2.2 application/pgp-signature
> ATTACHMENT part 3 message/rfc822
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:21:08 +0100 (CET)
> From: Holger Rauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Java Web Start on Debian Potato
>
> Hi Bill!
>
> Thanks for your quick and informative reply.
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Bill Wohler wrote:
>
> > Holger Rauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [...]
> > I think the problem is that Potato's libc versions
> are too old to
> > support the post 1.2 JVM's at all (let alone under
> Java Web Start).
>
> Ok. What libc version do you suggest?
>
> > For what it's worth, I'm running Java Web Start on
> testing.
>
> Is it "safe" to upgrade to testing (Woody) *now*? From
> what I've read
> there seem to be bugs creeping in now and then making
-------- snip ----------
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
