On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:32:41PM +0100, Paul Huygen wrote: > Andrew Nesbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (about suitable kooks for > LaTex): > > the Lamport one is a bit terse (more like an overview/reference) > Well, I must say, that I couldn't disagree more. I think that the > Lamport book is very well written, with amusing texts in the examples, > about gnus, gnats and armadillo's. I wish that more handbooks were > written like the Lamport book. When I started with LaTeX long ago, > I read the first three chapters, and could then easily start. The book > seems terse because it is concise, but it is the conciseness that > helps you to make a quick start.
A Guide to LaTeX2e by Helmut Kopka and Patrick W Daly is the book i
chose over lamport's book. it seemed to be packed with much more
information, and it got me through all my papers in college. (you
didn't think i'd use a wordprocessor, did you?)
--
____________________}John Flinchbaugh{______________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hjsoft.com/~glynis/ |
~~Powered by Linux: Reboots are for hardware upgrades only~~
pgp4NetUn8BTN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
