> I've also heard from several people that my sigs are coming across as > broken or invalid. Not sure why this is, they _do_ appear valid to me > here virtually always.
Gpg (as run from evolution) says: gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) gpg: armor header: Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 3 23:11:26 2002 MST using DSA key ID 55F2B9B0 gpg: BAD signature from "Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>" While we're on the topic, how's mine look?
pgpKbtTqlCIxW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
