On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 06:29:31PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> PDF of itself is open and standard.  It's a reasonable document
> presentation format (though I tend to prefer postscript).
> 
> I'd strongly encourage you to use tools other than Adobe's proprietary
> products, fortunately there are many which can be used to produce PDFs.
Hello,

first about postscript: AFAIK it is the "intellectual property" of Adobe
in the same way as pdf, and moreover it doesn't have hyperlinks and
more importantly forms (checkboxes etc) which are essential to
downloadable application forms etc. So ps is not an alternative in this
respect.

As regarding pdf, my point was that since it is adobe's standard, it can
be changed without publishing the new versions description, or I can
imagine even that they can simply declare that only they have the right
to build applications using this format -- am I too paranoid?

Thirdly, even if we accept pdf as an open format, it is hard to advocate
pdf among people who don't like command-line utilities or TeX, because
the only reasonable way to _create_ pdf-s right now seems to be either
to use PdfLaTeX (TeX) or create ps (with a printer-driver on some
systems :-) and convert it to pdf. Of course they can use Adobe's 
GUIproducts, Frame Maker or Acrobat Distiller (even this converter is
shareware), but they have to pay for it. And because forms/hyperlinks
AFAIK are only available with LaTeX or one of Adobe's products, it can
not be said that creating pdfs is open to everyone. I personally like
LaTeX,  but don't think it is "The Way" for everybody.

Best wishes: Andras

Reply via email to