I've tried them and they work (so far) like a charm. Many thanks, Brian. I hope they will go to unstable soon. Vlada On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 01:39, Cameron Hutchison wrote: > Once upon a time Brian Nelson said... > > Cameron Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > If this is true, could I create a meta-package, libvorbis0, that depends > > > on libvorbis0a, libvorbisenc2 and libvorbisfile3? I would have to change > > > libvorbis0a so that it no longer conflicts with libvorbis0, but that's > > > easy to do from the source. > > > > > > So, what I'm planning to do is to "apt-get source libvorbis", update the > > > versions to 1.0.0-3.0.1, modify the control file so 0a does not conflict > > > or replace 0, add a libvorbis0 meta-package, build and install. > > > > > > Will this work? (well, I'm going to try it anyway, but any feedback > > > from the list would be useful). > > > > In case you haven't built the debs yet, you can try some I hacked up at > > http://people.debian.org/~pyro/libvorbis . They appear to work as you > > theorized they would. > > I've built them already, and it seems to work. At least it solves the > dependency problems. Since I dont use vorbis much anyway, I haven't yet > verified that the applications actually work with vorbis. > > Thanks for your input, Brian. -- Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
