* dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 05:32:48PM -0600, shock wrote: > > | i had the same problem with a different spammer. no matter what i did, > | i simply could not get the procmail recipe to properly filter the > | thing. > > at least I'm not a freak ;-)
nope, just a procmail user. ;) and procmail recipies are too damned difficult. franky, filtering email simply should *not* be that hard. > | don't get me wrong, i still use procmail. i modified my .procmailrc to > | call a perl filter script i wrote using Mail::Audit and > | Mail::SpamAssassin. Now, rather than stumbling around with procmail's > | recipes, I just filter based on the power of Perl. > > I've been thinking of making a similar thing, just so I can list each > spammer on one line instead of 4. i thought about it long and hard before i finally took the plunge and wrote the script. i can't begin to describe how happy i am with the results. to *finally* be able to filter through perl . . . something i understand . . . email me privately, if you want, and i'll email you my perl script ad the necessary modifications to procmail. -- ____) ,_) ,_) (-(__ |_ _ _ |/ ____) | |(_)(_ |\ ( \_, _______________________________________________ | http://www.exitwound.org : hard to find | _______________________________________________ | Chocolate chip. | _______________________________________________ -------------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------------- | Version: 3.1 | | GJ/IT d- s: a C+++>$ UL++++ P+++ L+++ E--- W++| | N+@ o K- w O- M- V PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+@ 5@ X++ | | R tv+@ b+ DI++++ D+ G++ e++++ h---- r+++ y+++ | --------------END GEEK CODE BLOCK--------------
