On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:58:22PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: > MH wrote: > > OK, I'm working on that, but I didn't think I would need it until I had > passed the Debian installation path. > > > 2) But the debian package is quiet OK and you avoid the hassle of > > fulfilling mta-dependencies otherwise. > > > > That's what I figured!
Or you can just install smail or exim and then disable them. > Beyond the uscpi-tcp, is there anything else that I *need* for qmail? No. > I've already got the DNS working 50/50 (but it's not djbdns). I don't > like the fact that so much of djb's stuff doesn't work with any of the > typical junk - like inetd, tcpwrapper.... The problem is that I really It will work with these. > don't want to have both on the system and don't think that everything > else can work with a substitute - especially with the .deb package > dependencies. The DJB methods are not the normal Debian methods. You can go as far as you would like in either direction -- pure Debian, or pure DJB -- but if you want anything in between, you need to have both sets installed. I strongly suggest asking Debian questions on Debian lists, and DJBware questions on DJB's lists. -dsr-
