On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:30:12PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: | Gnus has some distinct advantages over mutt. In particular, it has | superior imap support, especially offline support, which was the | primary reason I switched from mutt.
Mutt has geat off-line support : mbox, maildir, mh, <something else I forget>. Mutt kinda has imap support, but it views imap as just another folder format, nothing special. I use fetcmail to transfer the mail to local storage, and off-line is all I see :-). | Also, it's more configurable than mutt, especially display-wise, if | you don't mind elisp... | | Mutt is simple, light, fast, and just works for most people. But, | gnus does more tricks, if you're willing to train it. Anyone smell | breakfast cooking? Oh, I was wondering what the smoke was ;-). -D PS (notice the smileys before beginning a flamewar)
