on Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 02:19:17PM -0400, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Your message, and Nathan Norman's was similar, showed up with > a *.txt attachment containing this: > > Mmh, perhaps attached PGP/GPG-Signatures? Does this mail also > have an > attachement like the others? It's signed with GnuPG. > > It also contained a *.dat attachment containing this: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE7xI0bumC7c373P0QRAufQAKDEUE1V57XdwNiyw6Lt4xBM2XzgGACfc0 > Ge > OEOeJptKqzpqn45QkTP/Cqk= > =UVFR > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > As I recall from a past discussion/arguement/debate over this, > it had something to do with mutt actually doing something > wrong... Or was it a misconfiguration on some user's part in > their mutt config ??
I doubt Mutt's handling this particular standard wrong. Both Mutt and RFC 2015 are written by Michael R. Elkins. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
pgpSnTIYSeVVK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
