On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > As far as stability, 0.9.6 has given me no problems, but I also haven't > exercised it that much. There have been a few troubles with 0.9.9. I > wouldn't touch 0.9.9 + Linux 2.4.10 with a 10-foot stick: major VM changes > + new filesystem == bad ju ju.
You really did mean to say that you "wouldn't touch 0.9.10 + Linux 2.4.10 with a 10-foot stick," didn't you? (Forgive my obtuseness if that's not the case... 0.9.9 + Ted's dir speedup patch + Linux 2.4.9-ac12 has worked just fine here for quite a while...) From all reports on lkml, problems are surfacing in 0.9.10... --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc
