xucaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: X> how stable is testing? would it be too risky to upgrade from stable X> to testing?
It depends on what your goals are. I'd say that tracking testing is a good idea if you consider yourself a Linux weenie to the point that bleeding-edge == good, but you don't want to spend lots of time debugging broken things. (unstable is good if you enjoy debugging, though it mostly works too.) If you're not willing to tolerate any brokenness, you're better off sticking with stable. (Unfortunately, I don't have any first-hand experiences to report.) -- David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/ "Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal." -- Abra Mitchell
