On Friday, August 31, 2001 9:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > > > I don't know if the windows 2000 boot loader is different than windows 9x, > > > but when I used to use windows 98, I had in /etc/lilo.conf: > > > other=/dev/hda1 > > > label=win > > > > Works just fine for w2k. > > > I am not sure though cos yday I removed Win2k , put back Win ME and only > then did the dual boot work. Owise i used to get that > "inlcuding Win9" > "Fatal: no image installed" error. Havent still figured out the problem. > Giri
I saw in another message that the choice of NTFS or FAT-32 might make a difference. Mine is NTFS and it works with the simple config above but I can't speak to the FAT-32 case. -g
