On 25 Aug 2001, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:40:06AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > Well, this was why I asked the question originally. Dlocate -s says that > > ldso is in the oldlibs section and is optional, yet if you tell apt-get > > to remove it you are told it is essential and you have to remove it > > explicitly. I don't see how it can be both optional and essential. > > Optional in woody and essential in potato? Your description of the > situation sounds like what I would expect if your installed ldso > package is from a version where it's optional, but your sources.list > currently points at a version where it's essential. > > -- > With the arrest of Dimitry Sklyarov it has become apparent that it is not > safe for non US software engineers to visit the United States. - Alan Cox > "To prevent unauthorized reading..." - Adobe eBook reader license > >
Could be. This was originally a potato version but I've been keeping up to date with testing for many months now. -- Anthony Campbell - running Debian GNU/Linux (Windows-free zone). For electronic books (Homeomythology and The Assassins of Alamut), skeptical essays, and over 130 book reviews, go to http://www.acampbell.org.uk/ Man can do what he wants, but he cannot will what he wills. [Schopenhauer]
