(when ignoring a set Reply-To it would be nice to at least include a short notice as of /why/ it was ignored)
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:40:32 +0200, Eduard Bloch writes: >Robert Waldner wrote on Thu Aug 16, 2001 um 11:24:55PM: > >> Actually, I have to disagree, gqview is (by "feel") at least 100 %=20 >> faster on slow hardware like mine. > >Well, THE eye catcher in the picture viewer scene is the new >Entice image viewer from RasterMan, using his new Evas library. Using >the hardware acceleration, it is really cewl and fast though. You got the bit about "slow hardware", didn´t you? And when I say "slow" I mean *slow*, in my case it´s a Pentium 166 *down*clocked to 50 MHz (25 MHZ PCI-clock * 2). There is no such thing as "hardware acceleration" in "slow" machines... Yes, for what I do the thingie is even slightly overspecced, one could argue. >http://www.enlightenment.org/pages/evas.html enlightenment on such a box would be quite..let´s just say: interesting. But ok, it may be of interest on more up-to-date boxen. So thanks anyway, don´t feel insulted, I´ve had a very bad day, yadda, yadda. cheers, &rw -- -- "Damn and blast British Telecom!" shouted Dirk, -- the words coming easily from years of practice. -- Douglas Adams ----
