Nobody ever did the reverse, when I set my mail-copies-to to my email, so why should the courtesy be one-sided? I guess I'll reset the header, but I doubt it'll do any good.
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Colin Watson wrote: >On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:35:44AM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote: >> Paul Scott wrote: >> > Using Mozilla I hit Reply then I change the "To:" field to >> > debian-user@lists.debian.org >> > and go about editing the message. (Occaasionially I forget and the >> > reply goes to the original poster and not to the group). >> >> I tend to reply to the list, and to the original poster. I have two >> email-adreses, one only for the list, and one (Which I set as Reply-To:) >> for private mail. If, for some reason, I cannot look throught the list, >> I still have the copy that comes directly to me. > >Many people object to being cc'ed (and so having to remember whether >they've replied to one copy of the message when they've encountered the >other one). If there's a Mail-Followup-To: header or a 'Mail-Copies-To: >nobody', it's a good idea to honour it. > > -- There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with suitable application of High Explosives. Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
