On 7 Aug 2001, John Hasler wrote: > William T Wilson writes: > > In states with "Good Samaritan" laws you are likely to be shielded from > > liability as long as any action you take is clearly intended as help. > > State laws are irrelevant. It's a Federal law, enforced by the same people > who are prosecuting Sklyarov.
What about world law? I belive that you always operate under the law of the country where you live in. But laws are only made to help people, what must be done if a law prevents you from helping those? A system that has too many of this laws is asking for Anarchy. So if you are able to login such a machine and broadcast a message to prevent that the entire internet will go down eventually, what is against it? No systems are harmed and certainly no one died. Greetz, Sebastiaan
