On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 08:46:53PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote: > also sprach john gennard (on Mon, 02 Jul 2001 03:30:03PM +0100): > > So far I've not touched this area and find the manpage for > > 'update-rc.d' a little confusing. The script to be edited is linked > > to /etc/rc0/ .... /etc/rc6/ (as defaults with runlevels and > > sequence code). Do I need to remove all of these links with -f, > > so running 'update rc.d -f xxxxxx defaults' ? > > I presume I could run the same command with -n instead of -f > > just to have a 'look-see' -but I'm wary of touching something I > > don't yet understand. In any event this seems too simple. > > you might want to look at the file-rc package, which i use > exclulsively. i find the /etc/rc?.d hierarchy too awkward to work > with, and the file-rc package makes this pretty straight forward and a > lot more contained and clearer. >
I use this too, but one thing concerns me. If you install a new package that expects to find SysV scripts and wants to update them, how can it do this will file-rc in the way? There aren't any /etc/rcX.d directories there any more. Paul
