I started using Debian because folks suggested it
was easy to maintain (e.g. apt-get). I really like apt -- it certainly makes
installing and downloading things a lot easier than other distributions.
However ... I'm not (yet) a heavy Linux user, and I find that a lot of times I
want software that's more recent than the stuff in the packages. This usually
means that I end up downloading stuff and compiling new software.
How do other people deal with this? Do you
install the new software you need manually and then when the package gets
released install it again with apt-get (probably not practical for frequently
updated software)? Do you just use apt-get by default and download and
compile when you need to (and then never use apt for those
packages)?
Also, I'm currently using potato because it's
labeled as stable. Would I be making a bad mistake by moving to Woody to
get some of the more recent stuff? What about mixing stable and
testing/unstable distributions? Is this generally unwise?
It just seems like it's hard to use Debian without
downloading stuff. Some of the software I'm installing seems like it would
be pretty common:
Cyrus IMAP (2.x -- current version is 1.5.19; there
is no later version in testing or unstable)
Postfix (20010228 or higher -- current
version is 19991231; there is a later version in testing)
I'd like to hear how Debian old-timers work with
this.
Thanks!
Jen
|
- Re: Currency of packages jennyw
- Re: Currency of packages Casper Gielen
- Re: Currency of packages Rob Mahurin
- Re: Currency of packages Nate Amsden
- Re: Currency of packages Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
- Re: Currency of packages Rob Mahurin
- Re: Currency of packages Steve Kowalik
- Re: Currency of packages John Galt
- Re: Currency of packages Noah L. Meyerhans
- Re: Currency of packages Steve Kowalik
- RE: Currency of packages Ian Perry