Joerg Johannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JJ> Aren't the LaTeX fonts scalable post-script fonts?
Not generally; they use a meta-language called METAFONT, which includes much more information than PostScript fonts use. (For example, 5-point Computer Modern scaled to 20 points looks much different from 20-point CM.) You can use PostScript fonts from within TeX, but you can't necessarily use TeX fonts in the wider world. JJ> I wonder if it is possible to use, say, the cm-family font just JJ> like "normal" X-fonts, eg. for the GIMP. The idea comes from my JJ> need for images containing text. Using these images in Latex JJ> looks ugly if they use other fonts than the LaTeX-style. There are a couple of options for this. I'd suggest using PostScript fonts in your document (e.g. \usepackage{times})[1]; then you can use a matching or appropriate font in your figures. (For example, Helvetica looks much less odd against other PostScript fonts than against Computer Modern.) I'd also suggest using something other than the GIMP for most figures, since GIMP only deals with pixelated images. Depending on what you're doing, xfig, tgif, and xcircuit are all good choices that can produce encapsulated PostScript files as output. [1] In all honesty, I think the Computer Modern fonts are somewhat ugly, and kind of like Palatino. This means that most of my LaTeX documents have \usepackage{palatino} somewhere in the preamble. -- David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/ "Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal." -- Abra Mitchell