I've been running reiserfs with 2.4.3 on a /doc partition which basically houses my mp3s - so it's constantly being accessed - for a couple of weeks, with no difficulties.
That's not exactly heavy useage though. On Monday 30 April 2001 16:49, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:15:20PM -0800, Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:47:06PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: > > > Renai LeMay wrote: > > > > I've been using reiserfs on my /doc partition for a while, and am > > > > very impressed with it's performance. > > > > > > It is fast, indeed. And fsck'ing no more :-) > > > > not true, when (and i say when) the kernel corrupts the filesystem you > > WILL need to fsck it, and unfortuantly reiserfsck sucks. > > My understanding is that most current reiserfs issues involve 2.4 > kernels. ReiserFS under 2.2.18+ is pretty stable. 2.4 is not > recommended unless you're involved in reiserfs development or hate > yourself (or the "friend" whose system you're configuring ;-) ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset="us-ascii"; name="Attachment: 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: ----------------------------------------
