Quittin' on Matrox ? I'd understand if it were for anything else then a TNT2. If you're looking to play games you're making a good point but still. i have a matrox g200 millenium with 8MB ram and found it to be a very very nice card, if you're not satisfied with it's 3d accell. speeds you should know that i wasn't impressed until i started playing with the apperture size and some other little tweaks. Once you get the right apperture size the G200 is surely up to a tnt2
Moreover, it's well supported in X and support nice refresh rates at any resolution, my brand new monitor still can't beat this card. i'm getting all melancholic here but man take a look at the picture quality of the G200 compared to a TnT2 (muddy colors) Oh well, i'll stop right here and leave it up to you. Maybe after this mail i'll get hired by Matrox, maybe not :) Joris -----Original Message----- From: Brandon High [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 9 april 2001 20:36 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: TNT2 and Potato XF86 3.3 In my workstation, I've currently got a Matrox G200 card. I recently came across a TNT2 card that I'd like to use instead, since it's a better card overall. Looking a /usr/share/doc/xserver-svga/README.NVIDIA is metions that only 16-bit color is supported. Not good. Has this been corrected in XF86-4? Or should I just stick with the G200? -B -- Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED] Honk if you love peace and quiet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
