Dave Sherohman wrote: > > From a security standpoint, how does exim compare to sendmail? What about > postfix? > > It appears that exim is Debian's default MTA, which is why I've run it > before and it's what I'm most familiar with. Now I've inherited a network > with several sendmail installations. I wouldn't consider arbitrarily > changing MTAs just for the sake of changing them, but I'm going to be > moving the servers onto new hardware, which brings up the question of > whether to reinstall sendmail on the new boxes or put in something else. > I'd like to go with exim, but I'm not entirely convinced that it would > be a good choice for functionality and security.
im doign just the opposite, replacinga buncha qmail servers with sendmail :) better spam control, and more supported, and of course im famillar with it, integrates well with cyrus and antivirus scanning. nate -- ::: ICQ: 75132336 http://www.aphroland.org/ http://www.linuxpowered.net/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
