On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
> JR> All you have to understand about forth, is that no word means what you
> JR> think it means, because someone (or some process) redefined it when you
> JR> weren't looking :)
> JR> On the other hand, it means that you can write a program under just
> JR> about any language that will run in a forth environment, and vis-versa
> JR> :)
>
> Yeah. Forth is really cool! What's a pity it is not popular nowdays.
>
On the otherhand, postscript is very much like forth in many ways, and
is only a printer away...
--
Jim Richardson
Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
WWW.eskimo.com/~warlock
Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.
