on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:36:48AM +0100, Robert Waldner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > (I hereby out myself as <anonymous>, the anonymization being pointless > anyway, since Karsten hasn´t checked his References-Headers and they > would reveal me anyway ;) )
<g> I managed to reply on-list when meaning to go off-list *twice*, in a row, on another group, in the past day or so. > So we could start a discussion which level of complexitivity and > abstraction is appropriate for a FAQ and then, once agreed, work out an > appropriate solution... Well. I could just post the whole thread from SVLUG we had on this very topic last week. Or, those who can't avoid looking at train wrecks can peek for themselves: http://lists.svlug.org/pipermail/svlug/2001-January/005534.html Cheers. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
pgpC1IyzImJf8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
