John Hasler wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Uggh, they removed X4 from Woody? I'm not sure I like this testing > > distribution thing. If I'm pointing at woody the whole time (which I > > have), I don't expect packages to be rolled back unless something is > > really wrong. > > You wouldn't have these problems if you would ignore the damn code names > and track the appropriate distribution. If you want to track unstable > point to unstable, not woody. > > _Don't_ _use_ _code_ _names_.
I usually hand out the opposite advice, especially when close to release. e.g. I tracked `potato' and didn't get into trouble when it froze nor when it went stable.
