Corey Popelier wrote: > What's with the tendency all of a sudden for Woody packages to be > dependent on Libc5? Only reason I noticed this was I've always avoided > installing Libc5, but in the past few days more and more packages have > become dependent on it, limiting my options somewhat :)
The dpkg is woody has a known bug that makes it declare packages incorreclty dependant on libc5. People have been told about this but it seems we don't have a fix yet, and developers are continuing to build messed up packages. -- see shy jo